Monday, June 15, 2009

Follow the Money


Understanding that media has become more concentrated is an abstract mental construction - time to break things down, especially in light of the fact that a 2006 BBC poll found that residents of many nations trust their media more than their governments.

As of 2001, there were 14 players in Canada`s daily newspaper industry. That`s a remarkably small number for a diverse and dispersed nation of over 33 million. Of the 103 papers owned by these 14 corporations, 70 were owned by the top four (Southern Publications, Quebecor Inc., Osprey media, Hollinger Cdn. N.L.P.). Since 2001, concentration has increased even further. Since newspapers are such an integral part of the information distribution network for Canadians, this is a frightening series of events. However, scarier still is how the same companies which control the flow of news through their paper chains also own local and national television channels and radio channels.

Other worrying recent events are summarized nicely in the following excerpt:


Astral Media owns 29 radio stations in Quebec and the Maritimes and 17 pay television stations (including The Movie Network, Mpix and Family Channel, and half of Teletoon). In April 2007, Astral Media announced it had struck a cash and stock deal to acquire 52 radio stations and two TV stations from Standard Broadcasting.

CanWest Global owns the Global Television Network's 11 stations as well as the three TV stations in the CH-branded network. In January 2007, in partnership with a group from Goldman Sachs, CanWest bought Alliance Atlantis, which added 13 specialty channels including Showcase, HGTV Canada, Food Network Canada and History Television. CanWest owns 11 of Canada's biggest dailies (including the National Post, The Gazette in Montreal, the Ottawa Citizen and both of Vancouver's dailies, the Vancouver Sun and The Province).

CTVglobemedia owns the CTV network and its 24 affiliates, and has full or partial ownership of 17 specialty television stations, The Globe and Mail and 35 radio stations across the country. CTVglobemedia's other conventional television assets include A-Channel, a second system that operates in major markets of Ontario and British Columbia: CKX-TV, a CBC television affiliate in Brandon, Man.; TQS; and ASN, a cable channel in Atlantic Canada.

Osprey Media owns 21 dailies in Ontario (including the Kingston Whig-Standard and Peterborough Examiner) and 36 other papers. In 2001, Osprey bought 16 dailies and 12 other papers from Hollinger International. In 2002, Osprey acquired 30 more newspapers (including four dailies) from CanWest Global.

Rogers Media owns several over-the-air and specialty TV channels (including OMNI, Rogers Sportsnet, the Shopping Channel and the Biography Channel), 44 radio stations in six provinces and magazines such as Maclean's, Chatelaine and Canadian Business. In June 2007, Rogers Media bought five Citytv stations, in Toronto, Winnipeg, Edmonton, Calgary and Vancouver.

Torstar Corp. publishes the Toronto Star, The Record in Kitchener-Waterloo, the Hamilton Spectator, and the Guelph Mercury. The company also publishes 95 community newspapers in the southern Ontario marketplace.

Quebecor Media owns eight dailies and 200 other local and community newspapers. In 2000, Quebecor bought Quebec's largest cable company, Videotron, and its French-language TV network, TVA.
Some proponents of media concentration suggest that fewer players mean that the industry is more competitive globally. They also point to the role played by the Canadian Radio and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) in permitting the changes that have occurred over the past decades. However, the CRTC has been criticized for lacking the political willpower, oversight, or enforcing powers to actually resist consolidation. In fact, the history of the CRTC shows the body often reverses a previous decision, is ordered to reconsider a decision (as has happened multiple times), or simply rules according to a market-oriented values system. This commission has not earned the trust of Canadians, especially in light of the further media consolidation that is occurring each year. Please contact the CRTC, your MP, your mom and your neighbour, and help to shine a light on the issue of media concentration and the biased approach taken by the CRTC.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

3 comments:

I have never thought of the cenralized ownership of media as too much of a concern. It seems inevitable that in mature industries that centralized ownership will happen. When there is no new market share to explore you start buying more market share.
I probably hadn't thought about it much as we are lucky in that we are in a large market and have a number of Dalies to chose from - all with pretty divergent biases. The Toronto Star to the left the National Post to the right, the Globe in the bathroom for serious business reading and the Sun lining the bottom of the birdcage.
The Spec is somewhere in the middle and I think actually does a pretty good job of being a Community Paper dispite it's corporate ownership.

My biggest issue would be if there was direct political - if goverment issues ( Shawinigan) were NOT being honestly examined that would be a big problem. As far as bias goes- Good god - have you listened to the CBC lately?? No shareholders there- but obviously LOTS of direction from the top on what constitutes Politically correct ( in their view) news. With them as an example I don't think you can lay the problems of the media solely at shareholders feet. Where there are influential people ( any CEO / editor ) yes there will be influences!

What I will concede that gets lost is quality of reporting / writing AND the extra "voices" of so many layed off reporters. Hollinger corp. had the typical "takeover model" Buy the newspaper, then fire half the staff. That is where quality and voice goes. Less reporters covering less stuff - and less indepth because they are overworked. Too much just gets ripped of the newswire, facts are checked at Wikipedia. And where there were many voices in the field now the whole corp of many papers and many channels just taps into their one main corospondent. Very $$ efficent.

Yes people trust the media more than their government- who would you trust more to run a newspaper - a corporation or the government?

If you have more specific examples of editorial interference on important stories,OR more importantly political influence that has resulted in interference, please do share. Maybe I am not getting the full picture....

@Carol Nasvytis - The inevitability of the concentration of industries under a capitalist system says nothing about the utility or desirability of such a move toward (media) oligarchy. It's also true that for those interested in seeking them out, there are a number of national or regional dailies to choose from or to compare to eachother. The problems start to arise when someone is exposed to one or another or a third paper with regularity. The fact that most dailies are national can also pose a problem, as it can suppress local interpretations of issues in favour of a consistent national position. However, this can of course be offset by trolling the internet, listening to local talk radio stations, and generally seeking out a multitude of media and public opinion leaders.

The biggest concern is that each individual media conglomerate is responsible - by law - to its shareholders. This means that there is pressure on reporters to present their stories in ways that will not harm the stock prices of their parent companies. Therefore, NBC Universal's associated reporters find their loyalties torn on stories about anything from open bids for aerospace manufacturing contracts (due to their jet engine division), to the evils of Alberta's Tar Sands and its effect on democracy and government transparency there (due to GE's involvement in oil and gas extraction and distribution), to the scope of resistance against the 2010 Olympic Games (http://www.no2010.com/) due to NBC's rights to cover the Olympics. These kinds of conflicts of interest are far too common, and just the possibility that such important stories could be finessed or managed is a threat to the idea of an informed citizenry.

Furthermore, check out the following articles for examples of threats to journalistic integrity:
-A Strike @ The Calgary Herald against interference on a political/corporate scale: http://www.ualberta.ca/PARKLAND/post/Vol-IV-No2/02steward.html

-Covergage of a video game reviewer fired for a poor review given to a game with a cozy advertising relationship with his website: http://www.cinemablend.com/technology/Gamespot-Firing-Questions-Journalistic-Integrity-7549.html

-On the other hand, here's a video clip of 10 examples of journalistic integrity, which includes references to FOX, etc:
http://www.videosift.com/video/10-Examples-Of-Journalistic-Integrity-Even-Fox-News

@Carol Nasvytis

Here are a couple of instances where I find the lack of media coverage extraordinarily... discomforting: Bill 474, a bill demanding that the effects of Genetically Modified Foods be more thoroughly determined before continueing with their cultivation, and Bill C-36 which concerns measure of the "anti-terrorim" agenda, mainly 'preventative arrest' and detainment without due process. Not to mention that no one seems to have a problem with Canada's "free speech zone" correct me if I'm wrong but I thought CANADA was a free speech zone. I digress.
I'll admit I rarely, if ever, turn to mainstream media sources for my news these days, so if any of these storys have made it to the front page please consider me just another ill informed plebe. But, have you not heard of them, start to consider the implications of placing so much power in the hands of so few.

Post a Comment